DenQAI decision lab

Hygiene access, capacity, and recall durability

Test whether hygiene production is supported by visits, provider days, recall demand, reappointment, and staffing.

Read the method

The governing test

The governing testWhich source or constraint could change this result?

Clear the non-negotiable gates.
Normalize capacity, cash, and clinical transfer.
Price workforce and payer friction as operating facts.

Choose a calculator

Fictional example

Results use the entered assumptions. Evidence and safety checks still require review.

Model v3.2.0

Open DenQAI project file

No input edits yet. Unchanged example values remain fictional assumptions. No changes since the last download or opening state.

Assumptions, evidence still needed, and local saving

Review note

This case stays in this tab only. Reloading, navigating away, or closing the tab can erase it. Download the case file to keep or reopen it. DenQAI does not upload it, autosave it, or store it in your browser. Browser exit warnings are a backup and may not appear on every device.

Planning case — assumptions and evidence require review. Includes fictional example assumptions. Formula v3.2.0.

Blank means unknown. Enter 0 only for a known zero or an item that does not apply and has no cost or use. Example values and modeled estimates are assumptions until supported by your records.

Calculator 06

Hygiene access, capacity, and recall durability

Hygiene production is only durable when patient demand, forward scheduling, room capacity, and retained people remain aligned.

Annual hygiene production$Completed hygiene visitsHygiene clinical daysActive patientsAverage recall intervalmonthsReappointed at checkout%Overdue recall patientsHygiene cancel / no-show%

Hygiene production / day$795

Completed visits / day8.2

Implied annual recall demand4,400Active patients × 12 ÷ interval

Forward-booked coverage54%Reappointed visits ÷ implied demand

Overdue share23%

Do not capitalize an empty hygiene schedule as upside.

N/A means the required denominator or recall interval is missing or zero; it is not a measured zero rate.

Reprice the model for the hygienists who are likely to remain, at market compensation and realistic days. A recall backlog without a recruitable provider is unmet need—not transferable cash flow.

Records to gather: User-entered records, source dates, verification states, actual contract and schedule data, provider activity, procedure history, staffing, and cash timing.

Decision, method, limitations, and required review

Use this if: You need to test an assumption before spending money, signing a contract, or treating a composite score as an answer.

Decision: Identify the viable path, the downside case, the assumption that breaks it, and the next diligence request.

Output: A transparent calculation with exposed formulas, limitations, stop-and-verify conditions, and a printable decision record.

Method: Use ranges and scenario stress; keep illustrative defaults separate from user data; never let a composite score override a non-negotiable gate.

Stop and verify: Do not treat results as an appraisal, diagnosis, legal conclusion, coding source, lender approval, or substitute for primary records.

Human review: Buyer, dental CPA, lender, counsel, clinical reviewer, benefits specialist, and operator according to the calculator.

Last reviewed: July 24, 2026

Next action

Use the result to request the missing evidence.

Reconcile patients due, completed visits, available clinical hours, and staffing evidence before committing to additional capacity.

Test the capacity plan

Record the source, period, responsible reviewer, and assumption that would change your decision in the case review note.