DenQAI decision lab

Competition and capacity census

Translate verified provider days, scope, patient access, and payer access into confirmed, probable, and adverse capacity cases.

Read the method

The governing test

The governing testWhich source or constraint could change this result?

Clear the non-negotiable gates.
Normalize capacity, cash, and clinical transfer.
Price workforce and payer friction as operating facts.

Choose a calculator

Fictional example

Results use the entered assumptions. Evidence and safety checks still require review.

Model v3.2.0

Open DenQAI project file

No input edits yet. Unchanged example values remain fictional assumptions. No changes since the last download or opening state.

Assumptions, evidence still needed, and local saving

Review note

This case stays in this tab only. Reloading, navigating away, or closing the tab can erase it. Download the case file to keep or reopen it. DenQAI does not upload it, autosave it, or store it in your browser. Browser exit warnings are a backup and may not appear on every device.

Planning case — assumptions and evidence require review. Includes fictional example assumptions. Formula v3.2.0.

Blank means unknown. Enter 0 only for a known zero or an item that does not apply and has no cost or use. Example values and modeled estimates are assumptions until supported by your records.

Calculator 02

Verified clinical-capacity census

License, NPI, and biography counts generate leads. The investment unit is dated site-level clinical capacity for the patient segment you intend to serve.

Dentist names in directoriesConfirmed clinical days / weekLocal full-time clinical daysGeneral-dentistry scope%Accepting-new-patient factor%Target-payer access factor%Probable additional physical FTECredible planned entrant FTEConfirmed hygiene days / week

Confirmed physical dentist FTE6

Names per physical FTE1.8×A directory-distortion clue

Confirmed segment FTE2Scope × availability × payer access

Probable segment FTE2.4

Adverse capacity case3.4Includes planned entrant

Hygiene-to-dentist days1.3×

Publish a range, not a false exact count.

Keep confirmed, probable, and adverse cases separate. Reconcile each person across sites, map common control separately, record the source and verification date, and recheck material competitors before signing.

Records to gather: User-entered records, source dates, verification states, actual contract and schedule data, provider activity, procedure history, staffing, and cash timing.

Decision, method, limitations, and required review

Use this if: You need to test an assumption before spending money, signing a contract, or treating a composite score as an answer.

Decision: Identify the viable path, the downside case, the assumption that breaks it, and the next diligence request.

Output: A transparent calculation with exposed formulas, limitations, stop-and-verify conditions, and a printable decision record.

Method: Use ranges and scenario stress; keep illustrative defaults separate from user data; never let a composite score override a non-negotiable gate.

Stop and verify: Do not treat results as an appraisal, diagnosis, legal conclusion, coding source, lender approval, or substitute for primary records.

Human review: Buyer, dental CPA, lender, counsel, clinical reviewer, benefits specialist, and operator according to the calculator.

Last reviewed: July 24, 2026

Next action

Use the result to request the missing evidence.

Verify provider days, clinical scope, appointment availability, and exact payer access for the patient segment you intend to serve.

Verify local competition

Record the source, period, responsible reviewer, and assumption that would change your decision in the case review note.