DenQAI decision lab

Build, buy, or walk away

Clear separate safety checks, compare viable entry paths, and identify the assumption that changes the decision.

Read the method

The governing test

The governing testWhich source or constraint could change this result?

Clear the non-negotiable gates.
Normalize capacity, cash, and clinical transfer.
Price workforce and payer friction as operating facts.

Choose a calculator

Fictional example

Results use the entered assumptions. Evidence and safety checks still require review.

Model v3.2.0

Open DenQAI project file

No input edits yet. Unchanged example values remain fictional assumptions. No changes since the last download or opening state.

Assumptions, evidence still needed, and local saving

Review note

This case stays in this tab only. Reloading, navigating away, or closing the tab can erase it. Download the case file to keep or reopen it. DenQAI does not upload it, autosave it, or store it in your browser. Browser exit warnings are a backup and may not appear on every device.

Planning case — assumptions and evidence require review. Includes fictional example assumptions. Formula v3.2.0.

Blank means unknown. Enter 0 only for a known zero or an item that does not apply and has no cost or use. Example values and modeled estimates are assumptions until supported by your records.

Calculator 01

Build, buy, or walk away

Read each evidence dimension and safety check separately. An average can conceal the one condition that makes a path unsafe or infeasible.

Evidence dimensions

Use 1 for unsupported, 3 for partly supported, and 5 for current, traceable support. No average or recommended path is produced.

Collectible, capturable demandCapacity evidence supportPayer economicsHiring feasibilityBuild execution readinessTarget transferabilityPurchase value vs. startupTransaction certaintyFamily and geography fit

Non-negotiable gates

Inherited treatment can be independently supportedRecords and system actions are attributable to unique usersThe seller has documented authority to transfer every promised assetThe downside case has enough working capital and owner runwayThe location and ownership load are acceptable to the family

Review postureEvidence gaps remain

2 evidence dimensions remain below partly supported.

Open safety checks0

Low-support dimensions2

Dimensions reviewed9

No composite score.

Demand, capacity, payer economics, hiring, build execution, transferability, price support, transaction certainty, and family fit stay visible in their entered units. DenQAI does not average them or recommend build, buy, or walk away.

Records to gather: User-entered records, source dates, verification states, actual contract and schedule data, provider activity, procedure history, staffing, and cash timing.

Decision, method, limitations, and required review

Use this if: You need to test an assumption before spending money, signing a contract, or treating a composite score as an answer.

Decision: Identify the viable path, the downside case, the assumption that breaks it, and the next diligence request.

Output: A transparent calculation with exposed formulas, limitations, stop-and-verify conditions, and a printable decision record.

Method: Use ranges and scenario stress; keep illustrative defaults separate from user data; never let a composite score override a non-negotiable gate.

Stop and verify: Do not treat results as an appraisal, diagnosis, legal conclusion, coding source, lender approval, or substitute for primary records.

Human review: Buyer, dental CPA, lender, counsel, clinical reviewer, benefits specialist, and operator according to the calculator.

Last reviewed: July 24, 2026

Next action

Use the result to request the missing evidence.

Resolve the first failed safety check with a supporting record, then compare the viable paths under the same household and capital assumptions.

Compare ownership paths

Record the source, period, responsible reviewer, and assumption that would change your decision in the case review note.